<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="https://syndication.webwiz.net/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>Web Wiz Support and Community Forums : CPU at 100% on client end</title>
  <link>https://forums.webwiz.net/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; Web Wiz Support and Community Forums : Web Wiz Forums : CPU at 100% on client end]]></description>
  <copyright>Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
  <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:27:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 12.08</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>https://forums.webwiz.net/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=21647</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[CPU at 100% on client end : that&amp;#039;s an interesting idea....]]></title>
   <link>https://forums.webwiz.net/cpu-at-100-on-client-end_topic21647_post115869.html#115869</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://forums.webwiz.net/member_profile.asp?PF=15890">simkiss</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 21647<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 20&nbsp;October&nbsp;2006 at 2:27pm<br /><br /><FONT face="Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size=3>that's an interesting idea.&nbsp; i will consider giving it a shot to see what i get. </FONT><DIV><FONT face="Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size=3>thanks!</FONT></DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.webwiz.net/cpu-at-100-on-client-end_topic21647_post115869.html#115869</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[CPU at 100% on client end : FWIW, I find that applting a transparency/opaque...]]></title>
   <link>https://forums.webwiz.net/cpu-at-100-on-client-end_topic21647_post115847.html#115847</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://forums.webwiz.net/member_profile.asp?PF=9949">dpyers</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 21647<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 19&nbsp;October&nbsp;2006 at 7:49pm<br /><br />FWIW, I find that applting a transparency/opaque mask to a .gif results in better performance at the browser than a transparent .png.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 19:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.webwiz.net/cpu-at-100-on-client-end_topic21647_post115847.html#115847</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[CPU at 100% on client end : Good enough. Chalk one upas two...]]></title>
   <link>https://forums.webwiz.net/cpu-at-100-on-client-end_topic21647_post115817.html#115817</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://forums.webwiz.net/member_profile.asp?PF=15890">simkiss</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 21647<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 19&nbsp;October&nbsp;2006 at 4:41pm<br /><br />Good enough.&nbsp; Chalk one up&nbsp;as two thrashings with a wet noodle for our whipping boy Microsoft. <img src="http://forums.webwiz.net/smileys/smiley36.gif" height="17" width="17" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="LOL" />]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 16:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.webwiz.net/cpu-at-100-on-client-end_topic21647_post115817.html#115817</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[CPU at 100% on client end : It may just be naff IE for you...]]></title>
   <link>https://forums.webwiz.net/cpu-at-100-on-client-end_topic21647_post115815.html#115815</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://forums.webwiz.net/member_profile.asp?PF=1">WebWiz-Bruce</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 21647<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 19&nbsp;October&nbsp;2006 at 4:26pm<br /><br />It may just be naff IE for you with it's bad programming, as I didn't notice much of an increase when scrolling using Firefox on your site earlier.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 16:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.webwiz.net/cpu-at-100-on-client-end_topic21647_post115815.html#115815</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[CPU at 100% on client end : I&amp;#039;m not sure I understand...]]></title>
   <link>https://forums.webwiz.net/cpu-at-100-on-client-end_topic21647_post115810.html#115810</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://forums.webwiz.net/member_profile.asp?PF=15890">simkiss</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 21647<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 19&nbsp;October&nbsp;2006 at 2:52pm<br /><br />I'm not sure I understand your response.&nbsp;&nbsp; ...<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>&nbsp; "they would require more processing power client side to run."</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>I think you mean that transparency would require more processing power, however the effect is the reverse.&nbsp; With opaque images, the scrolling is much slower.&nbsp; Once I changed the opaque PNG files to transparent PNG, the render/redraw is much faster, but it seems contradictory to logic because transparency has to calculate each pixel's alpha value.&nbsp; So odd.</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 14:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.webwiz.net/cpu-at-100-on-client-end_topic21647_post115810.html#115810</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[CPU at 100% on client end : I can see why the transparency...]]></title>
   <link>https://forums.webwiz.net/cpu-at-100-on-client-end_topic21647_post115808.html#115808</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://forums.webwiz.net/member_profile.asp?PF=1">WebWiz-Bruce</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 21647<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 19&nbsp;October&nbsp;2006 at 2:46pm<br /><br />I can see why the transparency would do this.<br><br>When you scroll around a page the browser is forced to re-render the page, when you are using transparency filters that are built into the web browser they would require more processing power client side to run.<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 14:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.webwiz.net/cpu-at-100-on-client-end_topic21647_post115808.html#115808</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[CPU at 100% on client end : I had the same thought process...]]></title>
   <link>https://forums.webwiz.net/cpu-at-100-on-client-end_topic21647_post115806.html#115806</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://forums.webwiz.net/member_profile.asp?PF=15890">simkiss</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 21647<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 19&nbsp;October&nbsp;2006 at 2:13pm<br /><br /><P><FONT face="Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size=3>I had the same thought process myself, however, once I switched to transparency, it got much faster.&nbsp;&nbsp; I don't know where the logic is in there.&nbsp; It's probably one of those quirks that I'll never figure out.&nbsp; If you have any more ideas though, please feel free to share them.&nbsp; I'll take all the help I can get. <img src="http://forums.webwiz.net/smileys/smiley1.gif" height="17" width="17" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="Smile" /></FONT></P>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 14:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.webwiz.net/cpu-at-100-on-client-end_topic21647_post115806.html#115806</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[CPU at 100% on client end : I would also think the transparency...]]></title>
   <link>https://forums.webwiz.net/cpu-at-100-on-client-end_topic21647_post115795.html#115795</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://forums.webwiz.net/member_profile.asp?PF=12748">Mikey</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 21647<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 19&nbsp;October&nbsp;2006 at 12:50pm<br /><br />I would also think the transparency isn't helping]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 12:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.webwiz.net/cpu-at-100-on-client-end_topic21647_post115795.html#115795</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[CPU at 100% on client end : I have just done some tests the...]]></title>
   <link>https://forums.webwiz.net/cpu-at-100-on-client-end_topic21647_post115779.html#115779</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://forums.webwiz.net/member_profile.asp?PF=1">WebWiz-Bruce</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 21647<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 19&nbsp;October&nbsp;2006 at 9:26am<br /><br />I have just done some tests the the CPU usage when scrolling on the forum was no different to any other site.<br><br>However, the CPU usuage was slightly higher on your forum, and looking at it looks like the reason for this is the quite complex background image you are using which would require the GPU to work overtime re-rendering the page each time you scrolled.<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.webwiz.net/cpu-at-100-on-client-end_topic21647_post115779.html#115779</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[CPU at 100% on client end : I researched this issue in the...]]></title>
   <link>https://forums.webwiz.net/cpu-at-100-on-client-end_topic21647_post115752.html#115752</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://forums.webwiz.net/member_profile.asp?PF=15890">simkiss</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 21647<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 18&nbsp;October&nbsp;2006 at 6:28pm<br /><br /><FONT face="Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size=3>I researched this issue in the knowledgebase, but the recommendation was to upgrade to version 8, which I had already done.</FONT><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV><FONT face="Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size=3>Basically, when I open my forum on any of my PCs, it opens at a decent rate.&nbsp; However, once I scroll the browser window, the CPU shoots up to 100% and the scrolling stutters on each PC and performs a slow redraw of the page. </FONT></DIV><DIV><FONT face="Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size=3></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV><FONT face="Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size=3>Are there any techniques known to minimize the CPU usage for scrolling what amounts to a page of tables?&nbsp; I don't understand why scrolling the page requires so much processing power.&nbsp; As it stands, I've only just started creating the forum.&nbsp; I can only image how slow it will be once it's full of topics.&nbsp; </FONT></DIV><DIV><FONT face="Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size=3></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV><FONT face="Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size=3>Please help if you can.&nbsp; Thank you. <img src="http://forums.webwiz.net/smileys/smiley1.gif" height="17" width="17" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="Smile" /></FONT></DIV><DIV><FONT face="Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size=3></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV><FONT face="Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size=3>forum:&nbsp; </FONT><a href="http://www.dearallofyou.com/forum/" target="_blank"><FONT face="Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size=3>www.dearallofyou.com/forum/</FONT></A></DIV><DIV><FONT face="Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size=3>version: 8.04 MS SQL Server 2000</FONT></DIV><DIV><FONT face="Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size=3>host: godaddy.com</FONT></DIV><DIV><FONT face="Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size=3></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV><FONT face="Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size=3></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.webwiz.net/cpu-at-100-on-client-end_topic21647_post115752.html#115752</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>