Web Wiz - Green Windows Web Hosting

  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - German Version of FireFox - adware
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

German Version of FireFox - adware

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
dpyers View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 12 May 2003
Status: Offline
Points: 3937
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dpyers Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: German Version of FireFox - adware
    Posted: 17 November 2004 at 12:00am

http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=164892&hig hlight=

I guess the question now is what surprises have been put into other language versions. It's sad.


Lead me not into temptation... I know the short cut, follow me.
Back to Top
michael View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 08 April 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4670
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote michael Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 November 2004 at 9:36am
Well I read the German statement from the translator and if what he says is true it is not really that critical. Thus you never know how sites may start to exploit those reporting features...
Back to Top
dpyers View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 12 May 2003
Status: Offline
Points: 3937
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dpyers Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 November 2004 at 11:08am
Got to disagree with you on that one michael. If IE was reporting some of my browsing or search criteria to adsense without telling me, I would be mad and disgusted.

Lead me not into temptation... I know the short cut, follow me.
Back to Top
xeerex View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 19 November 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 601
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote xeerex Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 November 2004 at 11:25am
Originally posted by dpyers dpyers wrote:

If IE was reporting some of my browsing or search criteria to adsense without telling me, I would be mad and disgusted.


But it already DOES do that all the time without you even asking. I challenge you to use IE for 5 days of "average browsing" and then run an Ad-Aware or Spybot scan. Report it back. Then do the same with FF, although I guess you need to use the US these days. LOL.

Here's a perfect example:


Back to Top
huwnet View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 30 May 2003
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 1375
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote huwnet Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 November 2004 at 11:25am
Originally posted by dpyers dpyers wrote:

Got to disagree with you on that one michael. If IE was reporting some of my browsing or search criteria to adsense without telling me, I would be mad and disgusted.


do you use IE? because it probably does monitor you! :)
Back to Top
dpyers View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 12 May 2003
Status: Offline
Points: 3937
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dpyers Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 November 2004 at 12:36pm

I use Maxthon about 60% of the time, IE about 30%, and FF/Mozilla about 10% with Opera and Netscape occasionally for testing purposes. I've heard good things about NetCaptor and will probably be trying that in the near future.

But ie gets examined pretty thoroughly by the technical community specifically to see if it reports on activity and so far it's been clean.

I run spyware scanners every 4-6 months and usually find two or three, but they're there due to either deficiencies in the browser or in my browsing habits - not something built into the browser.
Blocking pop-ups and on those that I do allow to pop-up, closing it from the big X or the task bar and never clicking a "close this window" or a "cancel" button seems to help that situation a lot.

There's two things that disappoint me about firefox - they had several security holes and phishing exploits in the beta versions that they never publically acknowledged and never annouced if they were fixed in the 1.0 Pre-release. And although they posture as a user friendly safer alternative, they pull crap like this.

EDIT: To be fair... some of the FF security deficiencies were corrected by XP SP2 which leads me to believe they were more OS related than Browser related.



Edited by dpyers

Lead me not into temptation... I know the short cut, follow me.
Back to Top
xeerex View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 19 November 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 601
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote xeerex Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 November 2004 at 2:24pm
Originally posted by dpyers dpyers wrote:

But ie gets examined pretty thoroughly by the technical community specifically to see if it reports on activity and so far it's been clean....
...I run spyware scanners every 4-6 months and usually find two or three, but they're there due to either deficiencies in the browser or in my browsing habits


My point wasn't that IE's code was sending the information. We can't really know that since the code is proprietary other than using 3rd party tools to monitor the traffic.

My point was that the poorly designed security allows the average ignorant user to load their machines unknowingly with crap. Trust me. I make a living cleaning them up everyday from home and business pc users so it doesn't help my business to recommend FF.

Originally posted by dypers dypers wrote:


EDIT: To be fair... some of the FF security deficiencies were corrected by XP SP2 which leads me to believe they were more OS related than Browser related.


Good edit. I don't think you could argue with anyone over the sheer number of exploits found in IE and Windows. Of course, Windows relies heavily on IE as opposed to Windows does not rely on FF. I'd also submit that due to the Open Source community, those exploits (and any in the future) as well as the current European debacle, were found. Exploits in IE can't really be found until the damage is basically done. Then we are at the mercy of MS to fix them. At least if I don't want to wait on the Mozilla Foundation or community to fix a problem in FF, then I have the choice to hire a programmer to fix it for me from source.



Edited by xeerex
Back to Top
dpyers View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 12 May 2003
Status: Offline
Points: 3937
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dpyers Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 November 2004 at 8:14pm

I'd be interested in your experiences with people using xp sp2. I have a feeling that lots of people turned off some of the sevurity stuff because it was too inconvienient.

You're right about ff open source making it easier to detect and repair deficiencies. All browsers are broken in one way or another and the more eyes on the code, the better the chance of an early fix than a late one. 

My issue with FF isn't the quality of the browser or the features offered - still the best one for debugging - as much as it is with the actions of moxzilla.org. Like I said... their actions disappointed me.


Lead me not into temptation... I know the short cut, follow me.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.08
Copyright ©2001-2026 Web Wiz Ltd.


Become a Fan on Facebook Follow us on X Connect with us on LinkedIn Web Wiz Blogs
About Web Wiz | Contact Web Wiz | Terms & Conditions | Cookies | Privacy Notice

Web Wiz is the trading name of Web Wiz Ltd. Company registration No. 05977755. Registered in England and Wales.
Registered office: Web Wiz Ltd, Unit 18, The Glenmore Centre, Fancy Road, Poole, Dorset, BH12 4FB, UK.

Prices exclude VAT at 20% unless otherwise stated. VAT No. GB988999105 - $, € prices shown as a guideline only.

Copyright ©2001-2026 Web Wiz Ltd. All rights reserved.