Web Wiz - Green Windows Web Hosting

  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Users cannot edit their posts
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Users cannot edit their posts

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
WebWiz-Bruce View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
Web Wiz Developer

Joined: 03 September 2001
Location: Bournemouth
Status: Offline
Points: 9844
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote WebWiz-Bruce Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 July 2011 at 12:05pm
What Lord Justice Eady said was :-

Originally posted by </font>Lord Justice Eady<font size=2> Lord Justice Eady wrote:

bulletin board users’ comments may be defamatory, but are more akin to slander than libel due to their conversational nature


He said forums are more like slander than libel, but didn't actually say they are slander. The definition of the word slander is still verbal and not written.

Slander
1. (Law) Law
a.  defamation in some transient form, as by spoken words, gestures, etc.
b.  a slanderous statement, etc.
2. any false or defamatory words spoken about a person; calumny

Libel
1.
a. A false publication, as in writing, print, signs, or pictures, that damages a person's reputation.
b. The act of presenting such material to the public.
2. The written claims presented by a plaintiff in an action at admiralty law or to an ecclesiastical court.

Many people get slander and libel mixed up, but generally find that people send us letters about slander while solicitors get it right and send letters to us about libel for posts in forums.
Back to Top
Nick-V View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 26 October 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 319
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Nick-V Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 July 2011 at 1:04pm
...so its better to phone them and tell them they are a dick-head directly to their face?!?
Back to Top
billd3 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 19 February 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 530
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote billd3 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 July 2011 at 6:02pm
Yes.

LOL - I've found that most folks are more concerned about removing the content and making sure few others see it than a legal path that can end up with everything stated becoming even more public.

I tell our members "if you can PROVE it, post away, otherwise shut your yap as it's strictly your opinion and we probably won't care"
BillD
http://theamcpages.com
http://theamcforum.com
Back to Top
Paul_T View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 14 September 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 72
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Paul_T Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 July 2011 at 11:00am
Originally posted by WebWiz-Bruce WebWiz-Bruce wrote:

What Lord Justice Eady said was :-

Originally posted by </font>Lord Justice Eady<font size=2> Lord Justice Eady wrote:

bulletin board users’ comments may be defamatory, but are more akin to slander than libel due to their conversational nature


He said forums are more like slander than libel, but didn't actually say they are slander. The definition of the word slander is still verbal and not written.

Slander
1. (Law) Law
a.  defamation in some transient form, as by spoken words, gestures, etc.
b.  a slanderous statement, etc.
2. any false or defamatory words spoken about a person; calumny

Libel
1.
a. A false publication, as in writing, print, signs, or pictures, that damages a person's reputation.
b. The act of presenting such material to the public.
2. The written claims presented by a plaintiff in an action at admiralty law or to an ecclesiastical court.

Many people get slander and libel mixed up, but generally find that people send us letters about slander while solicitors get it right and send letters to us about libel for posts in forums.


Hi Bruce,

Yes you are correct and many barristers would agree that it is actually libel. I'm not trying to get into any argument here with you Bruce, but considering Lord Justice Eady stated that, i think he is correct and was trying to sway it towards slander and i would agree with him on that. What is your opinion on version 10 with the "live chat" would this be considered libel too? i still think it would be considered "slander" as it's in live chat mode. Lord Justice Eady BTW is considered the top man regarding this field (slander,libel & defamation) in the High court of London.

Regards Paul.
Back to Top
RadioActiveLamb View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 29 December 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 171
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote RadioActiveLamb Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 July 2011 at 3:06pm
My issue has been resolved. Can we have the debate in another topic?
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.08
Copyright ©2001-2026 Web Wiz Ltd.


Become a Fan on Facebook Follow us on X Connect with us on LinkedIn Web Wiz Blogs
About Web Wiz | Contact Web Wiz | Terms & Conditions | Cookies | Privacy Notice

Web Wiz is the trading name of Web Wiz Ltd. Company registration No. 05977755. Registered in England and Wales.
Registered office: Web Wiz Ltd, Unit 18, The Glenmore Centre, Fancy Road, Poole, Dorset, BH12 4FB, UK.

Prices exclude VAT at 20% unless otherwise stated. VAT No. GB988999105 - $, € prices shown as a guideline only.

Copyright ©2001-2026 Web Wiz Ltd. All rights reserved.