real player can go to hell
Printed From: Web Wiz Forums
Category: General Discussion
Forum Name: General Discussion
Forum Description: General discussion and chat on any topic.
URL: https://forums.webwiz.net/forum_posts.asp?TID=15613
Printed Date: 31 March 2026 at 2:42pm Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.08 - https://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: real player can go to hell
Posted By: the boss
Subject: real player can go to hell
Date Posted: 27 June 2005 at 10:28am
never seen such a lousy, slow, aggresive, baby like media player.. why do these morons at real assume that the end user is a total infant and needs to be guided and helped in each and every
sorry just needed to vent a little bit!!
------------- http://www.web2messenger.com/theboss">
|
Replies:
Posted By: xeerex
Date Posted: 27 June 2005 at 11:18am
And why would anyone even want to use the Real Player based on the past and current issues with it???
You should try the Alternative Real Player...muahahhaah.
------------- http://webspacegeeks.com - Need Hosting, Domains, Dedicated Servers?
http://www.smartergeek.com - web design | pc support | training | podcasts | video production
|
Posted By: Bluefrog
Date Posted: 27 June 2005 at 5:53pm
Real Player has improved a LOT since a few years ago. Their servers are actually pretty cool.
------------- http://renegademinds.com/" rel="nofollow - Renegade Minds - Guitar Software http://renegademinds.com/Default.aspx?tabid=65" rel="nofollow - Slow Down Music
|
Posted By: xeerex
Date Posted: 28 June 2005 at 12:59am
wrote:
Their servers are actually pretty cool. |
Their servers might be cool -- but why use a proprietary format for
streaming? Besides, I have to install the "client" software which is
just not worth it IMHO. For any real content, I would suggest you
google for "alternative real player". Then you get the benefit of their
cool servers without using their software.
------------- http://webspacegeeks.com - Need Hosting, Domains, Dedicated Servers?
http://www.smartergeek.com - web design | pc support | training | podcasts | video production
|
Posted By: the boss
Date Posted: 28 June 2005 at 5:48am
yeah i tried that alternative.. never got it working tho..
------------- http://www.web2messenger.com/theboss">
|
Posted By: Bluefrog
Date Posted: 28 June 2005 at 6:08am
xeerex wrote:
wrote:
Their servers are actually pretty cool. |
Their servers might be cool -- but why use a proprietary format for
streaming? Besides, I have to install the "client" software which is
just not worth it IMHO. For any real content, I would suggest you
google for "alternative real player". Then you get the benefit of their
cool servers without using their software.
|
There are some very compelling reasons to use Real servers for
streaming - not the least of which is bandwidth and user experience.
Real lets you specify different settings for different bandwidth users
and automatically deliver the best content for the connection, e.g.
56k, 128k, 384k, 1.5Mbps, etc.
I don't know if the "alternative real player" will facilitate a Real
server. And actually, the Real Media format is pretty good when
compared with a lot of others.
Their client software used to be really bad, but it has improved
MAJORLY. They are definitely worth checking out if you haven't done so
in a few years.
Another thing about Real players is that they are a fantastic rich
media platform for delivering wicked presentations and things. It's
amazing that people haven't picked up on it. Same could be said for
QuickTime, but they are still weak in comparison to Real for that.
------------- http://renegademinds.com/" rel="nofollow - Renegade Minds - Guitar Software http://renegademinds.com/Default.aspx?tabid=65" rel="nofollow - Slow Down Music
|
Posted By: the boss
Date Posted: 29 June 2005 at 5:01am
what ever the reason is.. their defacto standard is to nanny the end-user by flooding him with thousand of wizards and useless defaults.. and i would bomb them any day!!.. now why terroists dont attack offices of these garbage compaies.. i wish real player f**king dies..
------------- http://www.web2messenger.com/theboss">
|
Posted By: Gullanian
Date Posted: 01 July 2005 at 9:27am
|
I never like Real Player.. Winamp is the best IMHO.
|
Posted By: huwnet
Date Posted: 01 July 2005 at 12:24pm
Now the all the core Winamp developers have left I dont reckons much will be done with Winamp.
And AOL are trying to kill it off!

|
Posted By: the boss
Date Posted: 03 July 2005 at 4:10am
winamp can f**king die to.. live windows media player live long!
------------- http://www.web2messenger.com/theboss">
|
Posted By: ipathan
Date Posted: 16 July 2005 at 10:43pm
Bluefrog wrote:
xeerex wrote:
wrote:
Their servers are actually pretty cool. |
Their servers might be cool -- but why use a proprietary format for streaming? Besides, I have to install the "client" software which is just not worth it IMHO. For any real content, I would suggest you google for "alternative real player". Then you get the benefit of their cool servers without using their software.
|
There are some very compelling reasons to use Real servers for streaming - not the least of which is bandwidth and user experience.
Real lets you specify different settings for different bandwidth users and automatically deliver the best content for the connection, e.g. 56k, 128k, 384k, 1.5Mbps, etc.
I don't know if the "alternative real player" will facilitate a Real server. And actually, the Real Media format is pretty good when compared with a lot of others.
Their client software used to be really bad, but it has improved MAJORLY. They are definitely worth checking out if you haven't done so in a few years.
Another thing about Real players is that they are a fantastic rich media platform for delivering wicked presentations and things. It's amazing that people haven't picked up on it. Same could be said for QuickTime, but they are still weak in comparison to Real for that.
|
------------- ipathan
|
Posted By: ipathan
Date Posted: 16 July 2005 at 10:47pm
|
Hi,
I have been hosting a on demand music web site for last few months and I tried Shoutcast and Micorsoft Media server. They both dont worth a try. Does any one know about any hosting company offer Real Player Hosting.
------------- ipathan
|
Posted By: the boss
Date Posted: 17 July 2005 at 4:16am
real player sucks.. did u not get the thread topic!!
------------- http://www.web2messenger.com/theboss">
|
Posted By: dpyers
Date Posted: 17 July 2005 at 1:55pm
ipathan wrote:
Does any one know about any hosting company offer Real
Player Hosting. | Check the adds forum on webhostingtalk.com
-------------
Lead me not into temptation... I know the short cut, follow me.
|
Posted By: shovel
Date Posted: 19 July 2005 at 3:57pm
the boss wrote:
real player sucks.. did u not get the thread topic!! |
Don't be so afraid to express what you really mean ... are you trying to say you don't like Real Player? 
Jim
|
|