ASP.NET 2.0 & Me.
Printed From: Web Wiz Forums
Category: General Discussion
Forum Name: General Discussion
Forum Description: General discussion and chat on any topic.
URL: https://forums.webwiz.net/forum_posts.asp?TID=16092
Printed Date: 31 March 2026 at 11:59am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.08 - https://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: ASP.NET 2.0 & Me.
Posted By: davidshq
Subject: ASP.NET 2.0 & Me.
Date Posted: 04 August 2005 at 3:44pm
|
So, I have a nice new application all completed. Its written in ASP.NET
2.0/VB.NET using Visual Web Developer Express. The back-end database is
SQL Server 2005 Express. Now, my dilemma. Microsoft hasn't given a
go-live license of SQL Server 2005 (full) and no one wants to run 2005
Express on shared hosting. So, here is my application with nowhere to
go. How I wish I had an extra grand to drop into a high-speed line,
server, and Windows 2003 so that I could run this thing. But for the
time being it looks like I am left waiting for Microsoft to decide to
release SQL Server 2005 Go-Live license, hopefully before the Nov. 7th
RTM. Pahhh. ------------- - http://www.davemackey.net/" rel="nofollow - Dave Mackey - Virtual Home. |
Replies:
Posted By: michael
Date Posted: 04 August 2005 at 5:55pm
|
This is truly a dilemma. I have a completed asp.net Gallery Application with Membership provider and a bunch of CLR SP's ready to go, but there is no host that is running 2k5 Server so I too have to wait to abandon Community Server for my personal Gallery site. ------------- http://baumannphoto.com" rel="nofollow - Blog | http://mpgtracker.com" rel="nofollow - MPG Tracker |
Posted By: dpyers
Date Posted: 04 August 2005 at 7:06pm
|
http://msdn.microsoft.com/asp.net/beta2/hosters/default.aspx - http://msdn.microsoft.com/asp.net/beta2/hosters/default.aspx
------------- 
Lead me not into temptation... I know the short cut, follow me. |
Posted By: michael
Date Posted: 04 August 2005 at 8:32pm
|
I know, but none of the one I inquired with have sql 2005, the ones I asked were sql 2000 ------------- http://baumannphoto.com" rel="nofollow - Blog | http://mpgtracker.com" rel="nofollow - MPG Tracker |
Posted By: dpyers
Date Posted: 05 August 2005 at 5:14am
Ahhh... sorry, didn't take the time to understand what I read 
-------------
Lead me not into temptation... I know the short cut, follow me. |
Posted By: davidshq
Date Posted: 05 August 2005 at 2:49pm
|
Sorry to hear you are having the same problem as well...But glad I at
least have company. I can't understand why Microsoft isn't releasing a
Go-Live license for SQL Server 2005? I have heard that OrcsWeb has SQL
Server 2005 Express running but that there is no remote admin. David. ------------- - http://www.davemackey.net/" rel="nofollow - Dave Mackey - Virtual Home. |
Posted By: davidshq
Date Posted: 10 August 2005 at 1:59pm
|
Hosting.Com (www.hosting.com/aspnet2.0/) is now offering ASP.NET 2.0
and SQL Server 2005 hosting! It looks like it is SQL Server Express
since SQL Server 2005 still hasn't been given a go-live license, but in
any case - here is what we needed. I'll let you know how it goes. David. ------------- - http://www.davemackey.net/" rel="nofollow - Dave Mackey - Virtual Home. |
Posted By: dpyers
Date Posted: 10 August 2005 at 2:44pm
|
I've got .net 2.0, VS2005, and SQL Server2005 on a separate machine. I
wanted to move them to my main development machine but can't find any
compatibility info. Can they co-exist with .net 1.1, VS2003, and SQL Server 2000? -------------
Lead me not into temptation... I know the short cut, follow me. |
Posted By: davidshq
Date Posted: 10 August 2005 at 2:51pm
|
Mmmphh. I don't have anything definite on that. But I am pretty sure I
have read a couple articles on the difficulty of placing SQL Server
2005 on the same machine with 2000. I have 1.1 and 2.0 on my machine,
and haven't had any problems...Don't know about VS2003/5, I figure that
would probably be the one most unlikely to cause problems. David. ------------- - http://www.davemackey.net/" rel="nofollow - Dave Mackey - Virtual Home. |
Posted By: Mart
Date Posted: 10 August 2005 at 2:59pm
| Yes, they can all co-exist happily. .net 2.0 installs as a seperate version and only handles apps compiled against 2.0. You can use a different instance name for SQL Server 2005 which allows you to have 2 servers on the same box. and VS just sits along side the other |
Posted By: michael
Date Posted: 10 August 2005 at 5:14pm
I would recommend though to install SQL 2005 as the default instance and 2000 as a named instance. Especially if you want to use Analysis Services, it makes it simpler. ------------- http://baumannphoto.com" rel="nofollow - Blog | http://mpgtracker.com" rel="nofollow - MPG Tracker |
dpyers wrote: