Print Page | Close Window

Visual Studio Express Editions

Printed From: Web Wiz Forums
Category: General Discussion
Forum Name: General Discussion
Forum Description: General discussion and chat on any topic.
URL: https://forums.webwiz.net/forum_posts.asp?TID=17169
Printed Date: 31 March 2026 at 1:17am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.08 - https://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Visual Studio Express Editions
Posted By: michael
Subject: Visual Studio Express Editions
Date Posted: 07 November 2005 at 2:12pm
I am glad that Microsoft decided to make the Visual Studio Express Editions free for one year. You just need to register and you get a key... Beats $49 for the retail box....
 
http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/express/default.aspx - http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/express/default.aspx
 


-------------
http://baumannphoto.com" rel="nofollow - Blog | http://mpgtracker.com" rel="nofollow - MPG Tracker



Replies:
Posted By: davidshq
Date Posted: 07 November 2005 at 7:02pm
Yes! And we actually get them free forever - whoever downloads them in that first year, at least that is my understanding.
David.


-------------
- http://www.davemackey.net/" rel="nofollow - Dave Mackey - Virtual Home.


Posted By: michael
Date Posted: 08 November 2005 at 6:31pm

Yeah, thus I am sure they are hoping you get hooked and eventually upgrade to VS Pro or so.



-------------
http://baumannphoto.com" rel="nofollow - Blog | http://mpgtracker.com" rel="nofollow - MPG Tracker


Posted By: davidshq
Date Posted: 08 November 2005 at 10:10pm
So far I haven't been very convinced that Visual Studio is necessary for web development. Are you aware of any fancy features an average programmer would use?
David.


-------------
- http://www.davemackey.net/" rel="nofollow - Dave Mackey - Virtual Home.


Posted By: huwnet
Date Posted: 09 November 2005 at 12:36pm
I certainly don't think there is anything necessary although some things do help.

Although cant ASP .NET 2 be compiled in which case you would need a compiler Wink


Posted By: Mart
Date Posted: 09 November 2005 at 1:32pm
Both asp.net 1.1 can use inline code or code behind (pre-compiled), the VB, C# and J# compilers all come with the .net SDK, you don't need VS


Posted By: davidshq
Date Posted: 09 November 2005 at 6:42pm
So far I am not very convinced that I need the full Visual Studio project. But one note. I had my fully developed code ready to go from VWD Beta 2, but when I pulled it up in the final release, it went nuts on me, giving me tons of instances of "NameofSomething" is not a member of ASP.nameofpage_aspx. This page assisted me in discovering the answer. Appears they didn't like the name of my code-behind inherit.
David.


-------------
- http://www.davemackey.net/" rel="nofollow - Dave Mackey - Virtual Home.


Posted By: Tegwin
Date Posted: 10 November 2005 at 4:52am
I have installed VB 2005 Express and it looks pretty cool.  I only recently started learning the 2003 stuff and now I have to relearn 2005



-------------
If you dont want my peaches, dont shake my tree


Posted By: Meson
Date Posted: 10 November 2005 at 7:07am
Originally posted by davidshq davidshq wrote:

So far I haven't been very convinced that Visual Studio is necessary for web development. Are you aware of any fancy features an average programmer would use?
David.
 
Visual Web Developer (VS Express for Web Development) is a nice RDE for web applications. It has the sql explorere thing (that I don't use personally), and all the controls on the left side of the window. It has the element properties thing too. It's free, so just try it. If you don't like it you can uninstall it.


Posted By: Bluefrog
Date Posted: 10 November 2005 at 11:24am
I love these guys! Free stuff is good! And free stuff from MS is even better!

MS stuff just works... I hate dealing with the "open source" free stuff because it just costs me time... Angry





-------------
http://renegademinds.com/" rel="nofollow - Renegade Minds - Guitar Software http://renegademinds.com/Default.aspx?tabid=65" rel="nofollow - Slow Down Music


Posted By: dfrancis
Date Posted: 10 November 2005 at 12:03pm
Originally posted by Bluefrog Bluefrog wrote:

I love these guys! Free stuff is good! And free stuff from MS is even better!

MS stuff just works... I hate dealing with the "open source" free stuff because it just costs me time... Angry

 
I share your opinion froggy. I don't get to say it often enough because the open source guys tend to be a little militant, but I think MS Rocks!!


Posted By: michael
Date Posted: 10 November 2005 at 2:05pm
To be honest I have not really looked at the express editions, thus I am working on a intranet site where I use the Reportviewer Control a lot, which does not come with the Express Editions. Plus, I am not sure if you have Source Control Integration with Expresses'

-------------
http://baumannphoto.com" rel="nofollow - Blog | http://mpgtracker.com" rel="nofollow - MPG Tracker


Posted By: dpyers
Date Posted: 10 November 2005 at 3:41pm
Anyone convert a 1.1 to 2.0 Final?

I've got a couple of 1.1 sites that converted well to the 2.0 beta's but been hearing a lot about problems going from 2.0 beta to 2.0 final.

Wondering if I might just be better off to convert from 1.1 again.


-------------

Lead me not into temptation... I know the short cut, follow me.


Posted By: davidshq
Date Posted: 10 November 2005 at 9:38pm
:-? I'm still having bad luck converting 2.0 Beta to Final. I agree that this MS software is great, but there is also some excellent open source software out there, e.g.:
1. OpenOffice 2.0 - Word Processor, Spreadsheet, Database, Drawing.
2. FileZilla - FTP client/server.
3. WinDirStat - Drive mapper.
4. Mozilla Firefox & Thunderbird - Browser/Email client.
David.


-------------
- http://www.davemackey.net/" rel="nofollow - Dave Mackey - Virtual Home.



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.08 - https://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2026 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net