source code!
Printed From: Web Wiz Forums
Category: General Discussion
Forum Name: ASP.NET Discussion
Forum Description: Discussion and chat on ASP.NET related topics.
URL: https://forums.webwiz.net/forum_posts.asp?TID=19471
Printed Date: 29 March 2026 at 2:09pm Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.08 - https://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: source code!
Posted By: dharmesh
Subject: source code!
Date Posted: 21 April 2006 at 6:31am
|
yeah Admin,
plz help me. i want to deleloping the discussion forum for the wedding planner in the ASP.NET with C# technology.
Can u help me how to write code for the forum. i want to free source code for the Wen wiz guide forum..........
------------- Dharmesh Parmar
|
Replies:
Posted By: MadDog
Date Posted: 21 April 2006 at 6:38am
Please do a search!
This forum is coded in Classic ASP, not ASP.Net.
There is going to be a ASP.Net version in the future, but it is not out yet and its probably not even started yet.
------------- http://www.iportalx.net" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Luke SkyWalker
Date Posted: 15 May 2006 at 3:55pm
well, i will starting to research how to convert traditional ASP code to ASP.Net code for Web Wiz forum...however with visual BASIC language...
------------- a long time ago in galaxy far, far away...
|
Posted By: WebWiz-Bruce
Date Posted: 15 May 2006 at 4:39pm
ASP and ASP.NET are completely different, writing a version in ASP.NET will require starting again with completely new code, in a completely different coding style.
Most ASP.NET applications use object orientated code in a modularised fashion, and come supplied as DLL's rather than source code that can be modified using a text editor, like you can with more traditional ASP.
------------- https://www.webwiz.net/web-wiz-forums/forum-hosting.htm" rel="nofollow - Web Wiz Forums Hosting https://www.webwiz.net/web-hosting/windows-web-hosting.htm" rel="nofollow - ASP.NET Web Hosting
|
Posted By: dpyers
Date Posted: 15 May 2006 at 9:25pm
ditto that! integrating classic asp with asp.net is easier said than done. Converting classic asp to asp.net is futile. Better to start from scratch and utilize the framework rather than run some bastardized version.
asp.net has been out for years and we still don't have any forum that comes close to the features, performance, and security of wwf. If it were easy to do, it would have been done. 
-------------
Lead me not into temptation... I know the short cut, follow me.
|
Posted By: Mart
Date Posted: 15 May 2006 at 10:31pm
|
I rewrote the enitre wwf front page in asp.net/c# once but there didn't seem much demand for it at the time, and wwf 8 was in development so the database would have changed before I rewrote the whole app
|
Posted By: mack
Date Posted: 28 May 2006 at 2:30pm
ASP.NET and ASP3 can run side-by-side though. Maybe someone could start off writing each page in ASP.NET. It wouldn't be THAT hard, afterall.
I would think the .NET version would be way faster.
|
Posted By: dpyers
Date Posted: 28 May 2006 at 4:44pm
Just re-writing a "page" doesn't get you anything. Only reason to go to .net is to utilize the object oriented nature of the frmework which means rewriting the app.
-------------
Lead me not into temptation... I know the short cut, follow me.
|
Posted By: mack
Date Posted: 08 June 2006 at 1:11am
dpyers wrote:
Just re-writing a "page" doesn't get you anything. Only reason to go to .net is to utilize the object oriented nature of the frmework which means rewriting the app.
|
Yes, you can rewrite each page, each feature, in ASP.NET but at the same time have it running side-by-side with the ASP3 version, so you can make sure you have all the same features =)
|
Posted By: dpyers
Date Posted: 08 June 2006 at 2:14am
I think you're missing my point.
The big payoff comes in how you handle the under-the-covers stuff. A .net forum will have a user object, a post object, a thread object, a forum object, a pm object, permission object, etc. It's how the objects relate to one another, inherit properties, and allow for extending their methods and classes that give a .net rewrite value.
Just rewriting a page to use web controls doesn't give you anything you don't have already unless the object oriented underpinnings are in place. Integrating those back-end objects within a large, complicated, classic asp code base is not something you'd want to do one at a time.
-------------
Lead me not into temptation... I know the short cut, follow me.
|
Posted By: mack
Date Posted: 14 June 2006 at 2:21am
dpyers wrote:
I think you're missing my point.
The big payoff comes in how you handle the under-the-covers stuff. A .net forum will have a user object, a post object, a thread object, a forum object, a pm object, permission object, etc. It's how the objects relate to one another, inherit properties, and allow for extending their methods and classes that give a .net rewrite value.
Just rewriting a page to use web controls doesn't give you anything you don't have already unless the object oriented underpinnings are in place. Integrating those back-end objects within a large, complicated, classic asp code base is not something you'd want to do one at a time.
|
I know what you're saying. 
What I'm trying to say is someone who has knowledge would be able to write all of that stuff, and be able to run the ASP.NET version next to the ASP version, and be able to compare each version until all the features are the same as the old version.
Hehe, it doesn't matter. I don't have enough time to do it. Plus, I've used classic ASP for.. gosh.. 4 or 5 years. if not more. And I'm just now moving on to ASP.NET 2.0. By the time I'm moved to ASPNET2.0, freaking ASP.NET3.0 will be out 
|
Posted By: dpyers
Date Posted: 14 June 2006 at 11:56pm
Ahh... my mistake, I thought you were talking about a single code base.
-------------
Lead me not into temptation... I know the short cut, follow me.
|
|