Siemens SX1 vs. Nokia 6600
Printed From: Web Wiz Forums
Category: General Discussion
Forum Name: General Discussion
Forum Description: General discussion and chat on any topic.
URL: https://forums.webwiz.net/forum_posts.asp?TID=7396
Printed Date: 30 March 2026 at 3:18pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.08 - https://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Siemens SX1 vs. Nokia 6600
Posted By: the boss
Subject: Siemens SX1 vs. Nokia 6600
Date Posted: 19 November 2003 at 12:20pm
|
what phones is better in your opnion, Siemens SX1 or Nokia 6600 Personaly i dont like nokia so my untimate choice is offcourse Siemens.. ------------- http://www.web2messenger.com/theboss"> 
|
Replies:
Posted By: michael
Date Posted: 19 November 2003 at 3:52pm
|
I am not a big fan of the SX1 Smartphone. I like the Moto/ ------------- http://baumannphoto.com" rel="nofollow - Blog | http://mpgtracker.com" rel="nofollow - MPG Tracker |
Posted By: the boss
Date Posted: 21 November 2003 at 11:30pm
can i ask why??  ------------- http://www.web2messenger.com/theboss">
|
Posted By: michael
Date Posted: 22 November 2003 at 4:23pm
Sure you can ask but aint giving you and answer  ------------- http://baumannphoto.com" rel="nofollow - Blog | http://mpgtracker.com" rel="nofollow - MPG Tracker |
Posted By: the boss
Date Posted: 23 November 2003 at 1:47pm
 ------------- http://www.web2messenger.com/theboss">
|
Posted By: michael
Date Posted: 23 November 2003 at 8:20pm
|
Just teasing you. The Siemens are fragile, one drop and they break. Though their Software is good so if you live in the sand I guess you can go for it I like the Moto because you can upgrade it's memory to I believe 1GB ------------- http://baumannphoto.com" rel="nofollow - Blog | http://mpgtracker.com" rel="nofollow - MPG Tracker |
Posted By: htoml
Date Posted: 29 November 2003 at 11:46am
|
I would never buy a SIEMENS because my dad has had 2 and neither of them worked and I would never buy a sony because there batteries are crap. I would never buy a brand which isnt sony erricson, samsung or nokia and I dont like nokia and samsung have no good fones and I alredy own a sony erricson but there are no more decent fones coming out from sony erricson and I like the nokia 6600 and the 7700 because they are like the N-gage in features but better and finaly if you dont understand wot i just put then slap me silly and then ignore my post! ------------- Tom :o) Have a nice day now |
Posted By: the boss
Date Posted: 30 November 2003 at 5:49am
|
ok the battery life of sony ericsson really inspires me.. i got a t68i and the battery stays up for 6 days or so.. i SMS a lot and use phone a lot..and still dont have the battery low alert showing up when im putting it on charge after 6 or 7 days or so Nokia sucks bcuz they make a lot of models but all of them have minor differences..practiallyall modesl of nokia r based on theoy that they r missing minor features ..they r never complete..like they will make a phone with camera but no memory card support.. then there would make another model with a camera and memory expansion support but no bluetooth,..and this kind of stuff.. samsung sucks bcuz their baterry life is too low and there is nothing special beside the high colour screen ------------- http://www.web2messenger.com/theboss">
|
Posted By: zMaestro
Date Posted: 30 November 2003 at 11:25am
I still use my Siemens S25, although I've SL45 Siemens are the best, nokia is for kids. |
the boss wrote:Posted By: htoml
Date Posted: 30 November 2003 at 11:35am
|
I compleatly agree about NOKIA's infact did you know that there is no internal differance in software or hardware except its appearance on the following nokia models... Nokia 7250 And another set of same fone's is... Nokia 7250i So no i dont like Nokia's but the nokias running SymbianOS are much better thats... So I would only ever buy a SymbianOS phone from nokia ------------- Tom :o) Have a nice day now |
Posted By: the boss
Date Posted: 02 December 2003 at 6:51am
|
well everyone knows that abt nokia and i mentioned this eralier that nokia make a new model every couple of months with minor differences.. god damn nokia ------------- http://www.web2messenger.com/theboss">
|
Posted By: the boss
Date Posted: 02 December 2003 at 6:57am
|
how abt Sony Ericsson t610 does the camera of SE t610 has a zoom feature... on its lens rim it reads 1:2.8 which probably means the zoom ratio?? ------------- http://www.web2messenger.com/theboss">
|
Posted By: htoml
Date Posted: 02 December 2003 at 8:25am
|
erm on my t610 it lets u shage size which zooms in digitaly and the openy problems with it are that the black area scraches and the screen isnt very good quality and the pictures from the camera arent very good quality but if u wana digital camera buy one not a mobile phone lol ------------- Tom :o) Have a nice day now |
Posted By: the boss
Date Posted: 02 December 2003 at 8:37am
|
the only reason u would buy a camera mobile and the only use i can think of a camera mobile is "spying" well sometimes i pass off a good scence and just wish i had a camera ready in my hand like yesterday when i came out of the bank.. i saw really cute cats queued outside the bank entrance door just like they r here to pay their bills or something..it was an awful scene..too bad i didnt had a camera on hand and if t610 has zoom.. what is the max zoom ratio.. i think 2x only ------------- http://www.web2messenger.com/theboss">
|
Posted By: htoml
Date Posted: 02 December 2003 at 8:42am
|
i duno wot it is but it wont be massive ------------- Tom :o) Have a nice day now |
Posted By: michael
Date Posted: 02 December 2003 at 9:45am
|
I have the T616 which is 33mm (Static no Zoom) the 1:2.8 is the Light Quality, the lower the better so a 1:1 is like close to eye quality. ------------- http://baumannphoto.com" rel="nofollow - Blog | http://mpgtracker.com" rel="nofollow - MPG Tracker |
Posted By: michael
Date Posted: 02 December 2003 at 9:46am
|
Oh 50mm is considered "normal" below that is wide angle and above is zoom-in ------------- http://baumannphoto.com" rel="nofollow - Blog | http://mpgtracker.com" rel="nofollow - MPG Tracker |
Posted By: the boss
Date Posted: 02 December 2003 at 11:14am
|
the nokia 6600 cant record video clip more than 9sec.. even if u have the MM card pluged in.. what a loser phone.. nokia always leave minor points so they can implement them and newer phones and keep making sales.. ------------- http://www.web2messenger.com/theboss">
|
Posted By: htoml
Date Posted: 02 December 2003 at 11:20am
|
thats business and wts wit the T616 al the T61* serise are the same
------------- Tom :o) Have a nice day now |
Posted By: the boss
Date Posted: 04 December 2003 at 3:44am
|
t616 is a variant of t610 only.. probably with a upgraded firm,ware but t610 can be flashed to t616 if firware is upgraded to newer one.. ------------- http://www.web2messenger.com/theboss">
|
Posted By: the boss
Date Posted: 04 December 2003 at 4:51am
|
and whats up with t630.. SE seems to fixing many issues of t610 with T630..but the body of t610 is better i guess.. thats what i leanred from reading online reviews and when i saw t610 myself at a shop.. havent seen t630 yet.. ------------- http://www.web2messenger.com/theboss">
|
Posted By: michael
Date Posted: 04 December 2003 at 7:36am
|
I am quite happy with my T616 (which is just the at&t variant of the 610). It does lack some features I'd like to have but you can't have everything. ------------- http://baumannphoto.com" rel="nofollow - Blog | http://mpgtracker.com" rel="nofollow - MPG Tracker |
Posted By: svpworld
Date Posted: 04 December 2003 at 9:39am
|
If like me you want a phone for... well making phone conversations! then I find the nokia's are the most logical and simplest phones to use, they maintain the same menu logic throughout all their range so no matter if you have to upgrade, you can still use the thing without taking a new course in programming! Next, they might not "cool" and "sexy", but personally I use my phone to communicate and not to "express myself".. I really don't need to express myself through a bloody mobile phone! Battery life is always sufficient and replacements are cheap, I've dropped nokias all over the place and they never give up easily, easy to get accessories, they are so cheap that they are usually free and I don't need a magnifying glass to see what I am dialling! So... there you go! Simon |
Posted By: the boss
Date Posted: 05 December 2003 at 2:56pm
|
well nokia's r always kind of incomplete devices.. Simens r more logicals and sy to ur.. and ur claims that nokia maintains same UI acreoss their all models is wrong.. take example of nokia's running symbian Os.. offcourse their menu UI difers from other nokia's not running symbian Os.. that just one example Nokia's r soo cheap.. u get all those fake chinese made accessories for them everywhere.. and the newer nokia's contains just cheap components.. there had been 20 accidents of cell phone explosion alone in saudi arabia.. all of them nokia and all of them new not older than 10 months ------------- http://www.web2messenger.com/theboss">
|
Posted By: the boss
Date Posted: 05 December 2003 at 3:05pm
|
the loser N-gage http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,113380,00.asp - http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,113380,00.asp http://news.designtechnica.com/article1833.html - http://news.designtechnica.com/article1833.html ------------- http://www.web2messenger.com/theboss">
|
Posted By: nguyencno5
Date Posted: 15 December 2003 at 2:28am
| Sam Sung E700 is a beauty. I love it!!! |
Posted By: the boss
Date Posted: 15 December 2003 at 4:14am
im not soo big fan of samsung but to admire they r now coming up with good phones recently.. cut the crap  ------------- http://www.web2messenger.com/theboss">
|