HP Digital camra’s.. recommend one
Printed From: Web Wiz Forums
Category: General Discussion
Forum Name: General Discussion
Forum Description: General discussion and chat on any topic.
URL: https://forums.webwiz.net/forum_posts.asp?TID=8217
Printed Date: 30 March 2026 at 7:46pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.08 - https://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: HP Digital camra’s.. recommend one
Posted By: the boss
Subject: HP Digital camra’s.. recommend one
Date Posted: 19 December 2003 at 7:06am
|
i need to buy some cheap economy class digital camera coz im in urgent need of one before 26 Dec 2003 ...and my finger landed on HP but im confused that which would be a better deal to buy HP photo smart 635 or photo smart 735 i have a limited budget and cannot exceed $200 USD .. (unless u r recommending me some expensive camera and send me extra $$ for it ------------- http://www.web2messenger.com/theboss"> 
|
)Replies:
Posted By: michael
Date Posted: 19 December 2003 at 7:33am
|
For you to stay in the budget is hard to suggest one as HP cameras suck in my opinion, I never liked them. Go with some cheap Canon or Kodak instead. ------------- http://baumannphoto.com" rel="nofollow - Blog | http://mpgtracker.com" rel="nofollow - MPG Tracker |
Posted By: the boss
Date Posted: 20 December 2003 at 6:46am
|
any other... ------------- http://www.web2messenger.com/theboss">
|
Posted By: Tegwin
Date Posted: 20 December 2003 at 10:30am
|
Fujifilm always make quality cameras.. Give them a try
------------- If you dont want my peaches, dont shake my tree |
Posted By: WebWiz-Bruce
Date Posted: 20 December 2003 at 12:28pm
|
I have a Nikon Coolpix 2100 and have taken over 3000 pictures with it in the last 8-9 months. Although it looks a bit battered now from being dragged around lots of festival's, carnival's, outings, parties, etc. and being well abused it still takes excellent shots and I've not had any problems with it. I think it cost me around £140 to buy. ------------- https://www.webwiz.net/web-wiz-forums/forum-hosting.htm" rel="nofollow - Web Wiz Forums Hosting https://www.webwiz.net/web-hosting/windows-web-hosting.htm" rel="nofollow - ASP.NET Web Hosting |
Posted By: BoLt
Date Posted: 20 December 2003 at 1:00pm
|
------------- BoLt (Computer Engineer) I suffer from Dyslexia, it means I can not spell to well not that I am thick. www.welshlens.co.uk |
michael wrote:
Posted By: God_Struth
Date Posted: 22 December 2003 at 11:02am
|
Yeah try ebay, sure to get some good yins in there!
(I have a fujifilm finepix a202, doubles up as a web cam and takes good pictures and even small movies. Would cost around £100 or less now, but I would recommend it!) ------------- "I'm only trying to help......" |
Posted By: the boss
Date Posted: 22 December 2003 at 11:45am
|
i couldnt find one at ebay who would give me a valid warranty for saudi arabia.. btw it has to be brand new.. not used.. offcourse i have tried all alternatives like ebay, half, computerHQ before posting this thread.. ------------- http://www.web2messenger.com/theboss">
|
Posted By: Awangku
Date Posted: 22 December 2003 at 11:10pm
|
I just bought an Olympus Camedia C450 about a month ago. The price was equivalent to USD250 -- after discount, of course.
|
It's a 4.0 megapixel digital camera and as far as photo quality goes, it's a good one to have.Posted By: zMaestro
Date Posted: 23 December 2003 at 3:44am
|
NEVER EVER NEVER EVER NEVER EVER NEVER EVER NEVER EVER NEVER EVER NEVER EVER NEVER EVER NEVER EVER NEVER EVER NEVER EVER NEVER EVER NEVER EVER NEVER EVER NEVER EVER NEVER EVER NEVER EVER NEVER EVER NEVER EVER NEVER EVER NEVER EVER NEVER EVER NEVER EVER NEVER EVER NEVER EVER NEVER EVER NEVER EVER NEVER EVER BUY HP DIGITAL CAMERA |
Posted By: zMaestro
Date Posted: 23 December 2003 at 3:50am
|
I've a very terrible expierence with HP Digital camera 612 C (~$350), it is very very very bad. Flash is useless, Resolution is to bad, picture is pixlated... no video capture. it is nothing if compared to Samsung or Fuji. |
Posted By: the boss
Date Posted: 23 December 2003 at 9:22am
|
------------- http://www.web2messenger.com/theboss">
|
im drowned.. recommened an exact model..Posted By: zMaestro
Date Posted: 23 December 2003 at 9:55am
just, keep away of HPs 
|
Posted By: cr*piecorn
Date Posted: 23 December 2003 at 1:35pm
|
i got a hp photosmart 735, i can't complain about it, the big advantage of hp is that they are really easy to use, not a milion button that do nothing, they bateries last a long time,runs fine on a linux box , here is a pic i took a while ago
http://users.skynet.be/crapiecorn/images/17-10-03_1.jpg - http://users.skynet.be/crapiecorn/images/17-10-03_1.jpg ------------- Ruben Schepers http://www.crapiecorn.be - http://www.crapiecorn.be |
Posted By: the boss
Date Posted: 24 December 2003 at 11:55am
|
alas i got one to speak in favour of HP.. well technically speaking digital camera can never shoot picstures to a quality of a manual camera but shooting quality pics with digital cam is more of a game of adjusting MV ratios and proper lighting.. and as long as u dont know the basics of handling a igital cam.. u will never be able to shoot pictures properly regardless how expensive digital cam u use.. i have shot some really good quality pics from a cheap pocket camera of about a cost of $30 USD..thinking that the more expensive digital camera u buy, the better results it would yield is just wrong... ------------- http://www.web2messenger.com/theboss">
|
Posted By: the boss
Date Posted: 24 December 2003 at 11:59am
|
thanks for ur reply man but the link u send me yields this
Access to the requested URL is not allowed!
Please, fill out the form below if you believe the requested page should not be blocked: http://cgi.isu.net.sa/unblockrequest - Form for URL unblocking request
Please, send other sites you feel should be blocked using the following form: http://cgi.isu.net.sa/blockrequest/ - Blocking Request Form
------------- http://www.web2messenger.com/theboss">
|
Posted By: the boss
Date Posted: 24 December 2003 at 12:22pm
|
i saw the pic.. great pic.. just wish u would have set up MV ratio properly so probably the faces wouldnt appear so dark that unable to recocnize ------------- http://www.web2messenger.com/theboss">
|
Posted By: zMaestro
Date Posted: 24 December 2003 at 1:40pm
| this resolution is not good at all... you didn't see the others |
Posted By: the boss
Date Posted: 24 December 2003 at 2:37pm
|
hmm ok im not ready to take risk with HP anymor probably.. i found a nice deal with Sony.. my base requirements r atleast 3mega pixels and 3x optical zoom... i figured out i can get a decent sony cam with a sony quick baterry charger + 4 NiMH batteries for just under or around 1000 Saudi Riyals not at all bad..only reason think im uncomfortable with sony is that it usies Sony memory Stick rather than more popular SD or MMC card but i dont think i would be really in such need to swap storage cards among other devices or friends of mine so i guess opting out for sony with a good capacity memory stick would serve me year or two well.. btw.. i just arrived back from a mall and saw HP 735 in action..really my mind was well made to purchase it when i let my house but after seeing it live in hand.. i was well made to refrain from it ------------- http://www.web2messenger.com/theboss">
|
Posted By: the boss
Date Posted: 24 December 2003 at 3:23pm
|
how about a sony p8 or p72 http://reviews.cnet.com/4504-6501_7-0.html?tag=pageNav&orderby=-7eRating&qt=&100021id=8169439&501071id=10641&501936id=&501375id=7810054&500409id=&1000036id=&id=20851343&id=20851317&x=36&y=10 - click here for comparison between both! ------------- http://www.web2messenger.com/theboss">
|
Posted By: zMaestro
Date Posted: 24 December 2003 at 3:47pm
 Sony is the best
|
Posted By: the boss
Date Posted: 25 December 2003 at 1:58am
|
yup..i am probably gonna get sony p72 ------------- http://www.web2messenger.com/theboss">
|
Posted By: the boss
Date Posted: 26 December 2003 at 3:53am
|
anyone??? zmastero, micheal, crapicorn, ...... no one speaks against sony ------------- http://www.web2messenger.com/theboss">
|
Posted By: zMaestro
Date Posted: 26 December 2003 at 4:52am
who can say anything about sony 
|
Posted By: Tegwin
Date Posted: 26 December 2003 at 5:40am
|
Ok now I will be in trouble for my opinions The only problem I have PERSONALLY with sony, and I say Personally which is that I dont like, not that makes it a bad camera. Is the fact that they use proprietary memory, which if one day you ever decide to get another make of camera you cant use the sony memory sticks. It would be bettter to get something that is compatible in most cameras and other devices like Compact FLASH, SmartMedia etc.. HTH!! ------------- If you dont want my peaches, dont shake my tree |
Posted By: the boss
Date Posted: 27 December 2003 at 3:02pm
|
i replied to this post but now it dissappeared unno why..may be while moving the forum databse odered p72 anyway.. batteries still on the charge.. expect to use it by morning as im goin to bed now to sleep ------------- http://www.web2messenger.com/theboss">
|