Web Wiz - Green Windows Web Hosting

  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - This page was generated in XX,XXX seconds
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

This page was generated in XX,XXX seconds

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
WebWiz-Bruce View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
Web Wiz Developer

Joined: 03 September 2001
Location: Bournemouth
Status: Offline
Points: 9844
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote WebWiz-Bruce Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 September 2011 at 2:15pm
The 300 concurrent connections that I refer to is not database connections this is the number of simultaneous connections to your website. This number is based on Web Wiz Forums that we host for customers that have this number of active users in their forums.

Each time someone looks at a page on your website quite a few connections will be made to the server to download the webpage, images on that web page, and any external JS or CSS files.

Most of our own servers host between 300 and 500 websites and typically have around 200 and 400 concurrent connections across all these websites hosted on the shared server. So you can see one web site using 300 concurrent connections would be using the same number of resources as 300 to 500 websites.

This means for a shared web host 1 website using 300 concurrent connections your website is using the same number of resources as 300 to 500 typically websites that are hosted on a shared server and so would be loosing money on your website and so will either ask for more money to host your website or throttle the amount of resources allocated to your website so they do not loose money on hosting your site.
Back to Top
WebWiz-Bruce View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
Web Wiz Developer

Joined: 03 September 2001
Location: Bournemouth
Status: Offline
Points: 9844
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote WebWiz-Bruce Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 September 2011 at 2:25pm
We can also supply you Virtual Server hosting if you wish.

When it comes to Virtual Server Hosting there are two types, VPS and VDS.

The cheaper VPS is typically based on Virtuozzo where you share the OS with other customers and you just have a container on the shared OS. I have tried this and find it not very good as you have allot of performance issues and a rouge user could take down your own VPS.

The slightly more expensive VDS hosting you get your own decated virtual server with it's own OS, diskspace, CPU, memory, etc. This is based on Hyper-V or VMare and works just like a dedicated server and gives you decent amount of resources and a rouge user on another VDS would not take down your own.

The page below explains all this in more detail:-

http://www.webwiz.net/virtual-servers/what-is-hyper-v-hosting.htm

Back to Top
billd3 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 19 February 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 530
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote billd3 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 September 2011 at 6:21pm
Nice part about VM servers is that if one server isn't using much for resources, the host can move resources to where they are needed. You can really run a minimum of memory and processors for each VM that way.
We've got 20 servers at work, but we don't have 20 physical processors - when one server is sitting idle, another is using the resources the first might have had earlier.
It's great way to use resources more efficiently.
Our IIS servers, SharePoint and SQL are VMWare based, and we're attempting to put together a clustered SQL server under VMWare- it would be almost bullet-proof.

BillD
http://theamcpages.com
http://theamcforum.com
Back to Top
WebWiz-Bruce View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
Web Wiz Developer

Joined: 03 September 2001
Location: Bournemouth
Status: Offline
Points: 9844
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote WebWiz-Bruce Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 September 2011 at 7:08pm
Were big fans here of Microsofts Hyper-v and are already using Clustering for Virtual Servers allowing Virtual Machines to be Live Migrated between Clustered Nodes when they need extra resources or we need to do some hardware maintenance. It also allows Virtual Machines to failover to another clustered node in the event of a hardware failure. Like you say clustering makes it almost bullet proof.

Windows Server 8 will soon be here with Hyper-V 3 which will certainly give VMware a run for it's money as new features with it's virtual switches and improved monitoring look really promising.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.08
Copyright ©2001-2026 Web Wiz Ltd.


Become a Fan on Facebook Follow us on X Connect with us on LinkedIn Web Wiz Blogs
About Web Wiz | Contact Web Wiz | Terms & Conditions | Cookies | Privacy Notice

Web Wiz is the trading name of Web Wiz Ltd. Company registration No. 05977755. Registered in England and Wales.
Registered office: Web Wiz Ltd, Unit 18, The Glenmore Centre, Fancy Road, Poole, Dorset, BH12 4FB, UK.

Prices exclude VAT at 20% unless otherwise stated. VAT No. GB988999105 - $, € prices shown as a guideline only.

Copyright ©2001-2026 Web Wiz Ltd. All rights reserved.