And this is how much different from closed source (aka proprietary)
groups? I see people all the time whining about MS's licensing schemes,
attempt to force upgrades (aka spend more $$), etc.
My response to both groups: if you don't like it then build (code) it yourself. Otherwise, STFU.
I really love the way that McVoy plays it up like BitKeeper is the
end-all to code management, blah, blah, blah. I daresay the OSS
community will get an app lined out. Just take a look at all the recent
(last 18 months) of OSS out there. Who cares if it hiccups kernel
development for a bit.
Topic Options
Post Options
Thanks(0)
