Web Wiz - Green Windows Web Hosting

  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Intel VS AMD
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Intel VS AMD

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
the boss View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 January 2003
Location: Saudi Arabia
Status: Offline
Points: 1727
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote the boss Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Intel VS AMD
    Posted: 19 June 2004 at 11:56am

firstly was Intel's crappy HT chips (which i would rather call "High temps")

then was P4 EE & PreScott

while intel is busy pushing the speed numerics high withou causing any real increase in system performance, stability and functionality..

AMD has come up with chips capable to do 32bit and 64bit making the market transformationn easier..

AMD chips r not only cheaper but do more work per MHz than Intel and surely one of the MS slogan is .. "Do More with less"

Also AMD hyper transport system is great, reduces latencies and increases resources and bandwidth

then comes their opteron processer.. i personally worked on a dual processor opteron and Xeon but opteron appealed to me more than Xeon in performance vs features vs cost basis

Ohh and AMD has more multimedia extension than Intel supported by their processor


Back to Top
Bluefrog View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 23 October 2002
Location: Korea, South
Status: Offline
Points: 1701
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bluefrog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 June 2004 at 12:41pm

I haven't compared them in a while, but last I checked, it really depended on what you needed to do for what chip to choose. I've got 1 box with an AMD processor and it just sucks. But then, I bought it super cheap and didn't care much about anything else. It's a 1.4 GHz but it tends to run hot a LOT and that leads to funkiness on the screen. It runs 24/7 though.

Some applications don't like AMD, and some love it. Time to check TomsHardware.com again I suppose. Oh, and if anyone does, check out the super overclocking - crazy! 5 GHz~!

 

Back to Top
MadDog View Drop Down
Mod Builder Group
Mod Builder Group
Avatar

Joined: 01 January 2002
Status: Offline
Points: 3008
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MadDog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 June 2004 at 2:00pm

I like to think of AMD for gaming and Intel for Applications.

Back to Top
the boss View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 January 2003
Location: Saudi Arabia
Status: Offline
Points: 1727
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote the boss Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 June 2004 at 4:48pm

i agree with mad dog.. AMD got lot heat probs but can be solved with a good heat sink and should be a prob for ppl living in cold areas or ppl in air conditioned enviroments

intel is good for application but must compared to performance gained vs price issue..


Back to Top
pmormr View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 06 January 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1479
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote pmormr Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 June 2004 at 6:28pm
i'm thinking about building my own new server... i'll have to look into the AMD Opteron processor, if it's cheaper and better
Back to Top
michael View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 08 April 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4670
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote michael Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 June 2004 at 8:28pm
I think it is not so easy anymore to say Intel-app AMD-game. Sure many high end games are developed specifically for AMD Chips but these dats more and more applications are written to support AMD just as well as Intel. In terms of Server Appliances, Intel is sure still leading but I have a feeling that will soon change. From what I last heard, AMD will soon bring you a Multi-Processor Capable 64-bit CPU and compare those to Itanium in pricing, many verdors will go there.
Back to Top
the boss View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 January 2003
Location: Saudi Arabia
Status: Offline
Points: 1727
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote the boss Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 June 2004 at 12:26am

well AMD i deploy proper marketing techniques would steal the intel market for server processor and i belive they have a lot potential to be a server processor leader in future even if they dont gain lot in desktop market or completely drop their desktop division leaving intel a sole player

Itanium is extremely expensive and crappy anyway.. i have seen enougf of them.. if 64bit processing comes at a cost of arm , leg and most probably head too..it is bettter to invest that money on x86 and try other techniques to gain performance for small and mid size business

AMD has got some serious oppurtunity for a serious challenge and i wish they would not waste the resources on propoganda shows like "AMD Reality Checks"

As for those thinking to build opteron servers, i would say to go or it.. firstly u would ease ur transformation of applications to 64bit, will not have to roll out exisiting 32 bit applications and the performance gain vs price issue is wuite good for AMD.. it might be sure less a bit in performance but comparing a price difference it is easy to be convinces for such little performance drop..

think of business who need dozen's of servers, they would not only save a good amout of cash but can get more performance by using those saving to add more storage, RAM and proably a couple of extra server to the cluster..

AMD has more multimedia extensions support at a lower cost that would probably be the reason why many games are optimized for AMD.simply due to more support for multimedia and lower cost


Back to Top
huwnet View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 30 May 2003
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 1375
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote huwnet Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 June 2004 at 8:40am
I use AMD because it was cheaper!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.08
Copyright ©2001-2026 Web Wiz Ltd.


Become a Fan on Facebook Follow us on X Connect with us on LinkedIn Web Wiz Blogs
About Web Wiz | Contact Web Wiz | Terms & Conditions | Cookies | Privacy Notice

Web Wiz is the trading name of Web Wiz Ltd. Company registration No. 05977755. Registered in England and Wales.
Registered office: Web Wiz Ltd, Unit 18, The Glenmore Centre, Fancy Road, Poole, Dorset, BH12 4FB, UK.

Prices exclude VAT at 20% unless otherwise stated. VAT No. GB988999105 - $, € prices shown as a guideline only.

Copyright ©2001-2026 Web Wiz Ltd. All rights reserved.