dpyers wrote:
I think you're missing my point.
The big payoff comes in how you handle the under-the-covers stuff. A .net forum will have a user object, a post object, a thread object, a forum object, a pm object, permission object, etc. It's how the objects relate to one another, inherit properties, and allow for extending their methods and classes that give a .net rewrite value.
Just rewriting a page to use web controls doesn't give you anything you don't have already unless the object oriented underpinnings are in place. Integrating those back-end objects within a large, complicated, classic asp code base is not something you'd want to do one at a time.
|
I know what you're saying.

What I'm trying to say is someone who has knowledge would be able to write all of that stuff, and be able to run the ASP.NET version next to the ASP version, and be able to compare each version until all the features are the same as the old version.
Hehe, it doesn't matter. I don't have enough time to do it. Plus, I've used classic ASP for.. gosh.. 4 or 5 years. if not more. And I'm just now moving on to ASP.NET 2.0. By the time I'm moved to ASPNET2.0, freaking ASP.NET3.0 will be out